Julia Stiles should stick to her day job

Hollywood actors can do almost anything—unless they are short on cash. A few weeks ago, the Wall Street Journal featured an essay by the actress Julia Stiles, on her 2009 trip to Cuba. She traveled to the island with a humanitarian aid group, then spent some time doing touristy things in Havana, and suddenly found herself broke and (gasp) unable to use her credit card.

Here’s the lede: “With three days left to go in my trip, I was walking around Havana flat broke.” This could be the beginning of a good story. But what follows is a generic, unremarkable account of a visit to Cuba by a person who clearly didn’t know much about the place before she arrived. The experience of being (briefly) broke in Havana caused her to think hard about poverty, communism, Cuba’s shabby telecommunications infrastructure, and the goodness of humanity. In the end, she borrowed some money from her sister and got herself back to the US without any trouble. Oh, and while she was there, she got nominated for a Golden Globe.

Stiles describes two women she met, who introduced her to the world of rumba in exchange for her buying them some cocktails. This has the potential to be interesting—after she tells the story, she writes, “It’s easy to romanticize the socialist ideals graffitied on every concrete wall, because generosity seems to be contagious. Obviously the reality is more complex.” But instead of confronting that complexity, she writes about the obstacles she faced while trying to increase her cash supply—slow Internet connections, poor phone service, and unreliable custodians of safe boxes. These details may be interesting to a person who has never been to an undeveloped country, but they are hardly unique to Cuba.

In the end, this is an essay about privilege, or the challenge of visiting a country where they do not take credit cards. I guess the story is supposed to be interesting because it’s Julia Stiles—while checking her email, she learns about her Golden Globe nomination. She writes, “There I was, thrilled to have received such a professional honor, yet still unable to barter it for cab fare.” Even her celebrity could not save her from this situation.

The funny thing is that her celebrity may be the thing that got her there in the first place. Stiles says that she traveled with an (unspecified) aid group, and then split off and behaved as like a tourist for the rest of her trip. The US Treasury Department allows aid workers, academics, journalists, and religious to travel to Cuba, but the permissions process (which I’ve been through a few times) is complicated, and the paperwork makes it clear that you cannot just “be a tourist” while you are there. I’m not sure what the policy is for Hollywood actors, but I’ve come to suspect that they have special privileges when it comes to Cuba. The best celebrity sightings of my life (Bill Murray, Robert Duvall, Ed Harris, and others) have all been in and around Havana, and I have a hard time imagining them wrangling with the Treasury Department and meticulously documenting their expenses and activities as the rest of us have to.

I believe that the travel ban should be lifted all together, but I think it’s fortunate that in the meantime, Treasury has given some people permission to travel to the island. Writers like Achy Obejas, Roger Cohen, and Jon Lee Anderson have all shown grace and determination in their efforts to understand and articulate the complex realities of life in Cuba for readers in the US, and I am grateful for their work. By comparison however, Stiles’ piece reads like a college application essay.

I know what it’s like to have been in Cuba for a short time, and to feel completely overwhelmed by the abundant beauty and decay and strangeness of the scenes, the walks on the malecón, the sound of Radio Rebelde drifting through the humid night air. It’s a powerful experience for anyone, regardless of what they know about the place. So I understand why Stiles might have wanted to write this essay. What I can’t figure out is why WSJ wanted to publish it.


6 thoughts on “Julia Stiles should stick to her day job

  1. Momin says:

    “like a college application essay.” Brutal!! And so true. I recently edited one for a distant family member…

    It’s disappointing, especially as since Stiles has an elite education (unlike, for better or worse, most celebrities—but then again, elite education tends to breed another type of disconnect).

    I dunno if you’ve seen/followed the whole Amy Chua WSJ article saga; not that I really follow the WSJ, but I’m starting to see a pattern of seriously lax—or even deliberately poor—editorial standards. About the level of laxity of Slate, except the standard of publication is fame or institutional authority rather than interest.

    PS. Have you ever seen “El Mundo Maravilloso”? I was surfing and came across it on a spanish-language channel. I didn’t watch the whole thing because I needed to get back to work, but I was really impressed by the bit I saw: it was a dark comedy about poverty and class in Latin America (I think Mexico specifically) that casually took constant jabs at neo-liberalism (e.g., “Chicago boys”). I thought of you, and that you might enjoy it if you haven’t seen it. I’d be interested to know, is there really that much awareness in Latin America of neo-liberalism as an economic philosophy, or is this film unusually intellectual (or did I watch an unrepresentative slice of the film)?

    1. halfwired says:

      Thanks for this Momin. I haven’t seen El Mundo Maravilloso, but I’ll check it out. To answer your last question, yes, there is much awareness of neoliberalism as an economic philosophy, though I’d say that the political meaning of it, and the way that people understand it, really varies from place to place. Cuba is an outlier in this regard, since they’ve really just heard about it through news and the grapevine (sort of), but it’s a very heavily discussed thing in other places, particularly Chile and Argentina, for obvious reasons. I actually wrote a sort of pushed-out post on Yoani’s interest in neoliberalism this fall, if you want to check it out.

  2. kubiche says:

    Considering that she was staying in private houses and not in Hotels, and even spending a few CUC in drinks with the dancers, (my God, how much you can spend in a couples of Daiquiries?), I believe it is a poor excuse for end without money. Maybe a “contribution”to the “independent” bloggers, might had made to loose the balance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s