For the red curious

People frequently ask me to compare Cuba and China on the question of Internet use, and just about everything else. Fine. They’re both remote, exotic, Communist (flashing red light) countries that people are very curious (but know relatively little) about. Yet there are many fundamental characteristics that set them apart, though some are more obvious than others.

On the question of the Internet: China has poured untold amounts of money, human capital, and legislation into restricting Internet use among its citizens, while Cuba, as far as foreign researchers know, has gone the cheap route: Internet access is so hard to come by (and expensive to provide) that extensive content filtration simply isn’t necessary, and Cuba’s chillingly effective regime of social control keeps many Internet users from using the Web freely anyway.

When I wrote my last post, “Internet access is not the same thing as rice,” I had intended to follow up with a second post explaining some of the more basic, fundamental differences between Internet restrictions in Cuba and other countries that are understood to be “enemies” of open Internet use. Cuba routinely appears next to countries like China, Iran, Syria, and Myanmar, where broad-reaching Internet filtering (censorship) regimes exist, yet there has been no evidence indicating that the Cuban government engages in extensive filtering of any kind. Some reports have hinted that the Intranet is the only form of network that is accessible in Cuba, suggesting that the island is protected by a “tropical firewall” of some sort, but there’s simply no evidence that this is true, and much to the contrary.

Internet use is severely restricted for most Cubans, but any person there with a pocketful of cash can easily circumvent this problem by walking into a hotel Internet cafe and forking over the equivalent to seven or eight U.S. dollars in exchange for a login and password combination that will allow them to spend the next hour browsing all but a handful of sites (most of which are Miami or Cuba-based dissident) as they please.

Of course, if they decide to start a blog, or engage in online activities that go beyond simply consuming information, they may encounter serious repercussions. But I think it’s important to recognize that the Cuban government has created a relatively reliable system of control in which lack of access (rather than technical blocking) is the primary obstacle to open Internet use. It is also worth noting that the main loophole in this system exists only for those with some degree of wealth. Wealth in Cuba? Isn’t that ironic? Yes. But that’s a post for another day.

About these ads

2 Comments

Filed under Technology in Cuba

2 responses to “For the red curious

  1. sy

    do you think foreign gov refusal to connect cuba to nearby undersea cable qualifies as reverse blocking of a sort?

    • I don’t know if I would go so far as to call it reverse blocking, since we have no way of knowing exactly what the Cuban government would do if it did have access to the cable. If the US government could pull its head out of the sand and eliminate (rather than just loosening up) the telecom export controls that are part of the embargo (a move that would make the cable available to Cuba), this would put the ball in Cuba’s court. Then we could find out what they would do if they could access to all the bandwidth they need.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s